Dec 14
Reviews David
battery, bp-4l, bp4l, charging, e52, e55, E71, e72, energy, extended, li ion, lithium, mAh, mobile, n97, nokia, phone, power, replacement, storage
As mentioned previously on my blog, I use a Nokia E55, which uses Nokia’s largest battery, the BP-4L. Now, if phone batteries don’t float your boat, then stop reading now. But wait, do you have a Nokia phone? Is it perhaps the E90, E71, E52, E55, N97, E72? Then if you are using any of those, would you like even more battery life? Well in that case, maybe batteries aren’t such a boring subject!
I’ve been testing an extended version of the BP-4L, sent to me for review from MobileFun.co.uk.
Continue reading …
Aug 19
How-To Guides David
accessories, battery, charging, electrical, energy, mobile, mobilefun, phone, power, powerpal, retractable, usb
I thought I’d share some alternative ideas for charing up your mobile phone today. Even the most compact mains chagers are bulky, and they give you yet another cable to be collecting dust and taking up space. So here are my two favourite methods for getting my phone topped. In fact, in all the time I’ve had my current phone, I have never used the mains charger.
USB charging my phone
1. USB Charging
These days, the chances are, when you’re at home and at work, you’ll have some time at the computer. What you may or may not know is that USB ports provide power, as well as carrying data. So my first suggestion, and my everyday charging method, is by USB, with a neat & tidy little retractable USB charger. I got my 2mm Nokia charger from Mobile Fun.
Retractable cables are great for saving space, although I have found that you need ot handle with with care because they can become quite fragile. With the charger I use, I occaisionally have to wiggle and turn it before my phone announces that it’s charging. Not great, but I do prefer it to a proper USB cable.
In the future, USB charging is going to become more common place. One of the worst things about mobile phones has been all the different types of connector. Last year all the major phone manufacturers got together and agreed to use a common standard, which was “Micro USB“. This has the added advantage that it will be one single port for plugging your phone into your computer (some of us do this!) and for charging. That is, you’ll be able to use your phone’s data cable to charge it from your computer’s USB ports!
Charging my phone with the PowerPal
2. The “PowerPal”
For times when I’m going to be away away from the charging station that is also called my laptop, I can run my phone from an AA battery, by means of sexy looking chrome tube, known as the Power Pal, which I also bought from Mobile Fun (I’m not advertising, they just sell handy stuff!). This comes with a selection of popular charging tips which plug into the top of the tube, and should charge most things, but do check before you get one! As you’ll see from the picture there’s a bright blue light to show it’s working. This light is fine in daylight, although in a dark room, say if you’re charging over night, the blinking light can be rather distracting.
The advantage of this thing is that you can buy AA batteries from anywhere, so you are never short of an energy source for your phone. It is slower to charge than USB because it’s charging current is 300 mA, rather than USB’s 500 mA.
I could power mine with any old AA battery, but I choose to use the USBCell, so that I can even top this up from my laptop’s USB ports too!
Update: I have done some further testing with the PowerPal since I originally posted this. I was having some trouble getting as much charge out of it as I expected. Although after eliminating other possible factors I think it must be the electronics of the device itself. I let my Nokia E51 get down to one battery bar, and charged it with the PowerPal using an Energizer Lihtium AA battery. Once the AA was discharged, my E51 was still only showing four bars (out of seven). The E51′s battery is 1000 mAh, so I would have expected to get at least one full charge out of any good quality AA battery.
Jan 7
Physics David
barium titanate, batteries, breakdown voltage, capacitors, cells, charge, eestor, efficiency, electrical, electricity, electronics, energy, energy density, farad, integrated circuits, li ion, lithium ion, Physics, recharge, roadster, solid state, storage, super, tesla
Something I heard about on Security Now (Ep.117) has got me rather excited and I wanted to report about it on here.
Batteries vs Capacitors
Standard mobile phone Li Ion battery
Currently, the state of the art for energy storage in contemporary electronic devices is Lithium Ion batteries. Despite the material used (the electrolyte), batteries are all pretty much the same, in as much as a chemical reaction occurs inside the battery which drives electrons that our electronic devices can use to do work. Rechargeable batteries use a reversible reaction, so that once you do electrical work on the battery (i.e. charge it), the reaction is reversed and can begin again to power your devices.
There are a number of disadvantages to this. Firstly, because we are reversing the chemical reaction of the battery, it takes quite a while to charge them. Also, again because of relying on a chemical reaction, disposing is difficult because the contents are toxic. Also, rechargeable batteries degrade over time, so there are only so many times that you can discharge and recharge them.
Various capacitors
In electrical circuits energy can stored in components called capacitors. Capacitors aren’t used in place of batteries because the amount of energy you can store for a given size (i.e. their energy density) has been tiny. A little bit of physics for you here, which you need to know to understand the significance of what I’m leading up to telling you! The standard unit of capacitance is the Farad. Most capacitors you come across are rated at the micro Farad level (i.e. a millionth of a Farad), ranging up to a few hundred micro Farads. In my personal experience I have only seen 1 Farad capacitors for car stereo systems, although the things are massive and expensive.
A capacitor is two parallel metal plates (connected to a circuit) sandwiching a non-conducting material called a "dielectric".
Capacitors work differently to batteries. The general model of a capacitor is two parallel metal plates separated by a non-conducting material called a “dielectric“. The idea is that when you apply a voltage to a capacitor no current can flow through, but instead the electrons pile up at the cathode and create an electric field within the dielectric. Therefore, energy is stored in a capacitor as an electric field. Hence, a desirable dielectric material is one in which electric fields can easily form (which is a physical property known as permittivity). There are some limits in which you can rely on capacitors, first all there is something called the “breakdown voltage“, which is the limit of voltage you can apply to the capacitor before the current starts forcing its way through (and thus damaging) the dielectric. The amount of voltage you can safely apply to a capacitor is the limiting factor in how quickly you can charge it to its full capacitance. There is also a “leakage current“, which is the rate at which the capacitor looses energy, due to the dielectric having a very small amount of electrical conductivity.
The advantages of all this over batteries is that you can charge up a capacitor much more quickly than an electrochemical battery due to there being no chemical reaction to reverse, and there is no limit to the number of times you can charge and discharge a capacitor. The latter point is great because you have a much more durable storage system and you don’t have to worry about disposing of toxic chemical batteries.
The next generation
Now, I can hear you saying wouldn’t it great if we could have a capacitor that could store as much energy as a Lithium Ion battery, in the same size package? Well, funny you should say that, because a patent as been filed by a company called EEStor for something called a Super Capacitor that has a huge capacity, huge breakdown voltage, and twice the energy density of Lithium Ion technology.
An EeStor Cell
The patent that Eestor has filed details a device with a capacity of 31 Farads (remember before we were talking in millionths of a Farad?), with a breakdown voltage of 3,500 Volts (and it could even tolerate up to 5,000 volts). The amount energy this device can store is around the 52KWh (187 Mega Joules), with a volume of around 33 Litres, this has an energy density of around 1 Mega Joule per cubic metre, which is about double that of Lithium Ion. You could charge this thing at 3.5MV 3.5KV in around 5 minutes! While Lithium Ion batteries slowly discharge themselves at around 5% a month, according to EEStor, the super capacitors will only discharge at 0.1% per month.
The Tesla Roadster
Just to give you some sense of scale of this, consider the first commercial electric car that is currently being made, the Tesla Roadster. Currently, its Li Ion battery can be charged with 53KWh of energy in 3.5 hours at 375 volts, and has a range of 250 miles. With a super capacitor, it could be charged in 5 minutes and go twice as far.
What’s more, EEStor claim to have taken one of the super capacitor units (a small subsection of the 52KWh model), and performed one million charge/discharge cycles, then tested the unit’s performance – No degradation!
Potential uses
Of course, when we are all charging our electric cars at home in the future, we are not going to have megavolt power supplies. Although the idea is that these super capacitors could be used as energy buffers. You slowly charge up a super capacitor in your home, over night while the electricity is cheap. Then in the morning, you can zap all the power from your home capacitor into your car’s capacitor. This will really help power companies smooth out the power demands.
Energy buffers won’t just be useful for homes, think about renewable energy sources like wind power or solar. This could be an efficient way to store energy which is coming in at unpredictable times and amounts too. Come to think of it, attach solar panels to your house and they could top up your home capacitor during the day!
As I mentioned above homes won’t be equipped to charge these large capacitors in super fast time, and will instead have to slowly trickle charge on their domestic supplies. Although I imagine we’ll have the electrical equivalent of petrol stations, equipped with high voltage supplies to zap power into our car capacitors as quickly as possible.
Other interesting features of this technology is that it has been designed to be mass producible and scalable, based on integrated circuit technology. This means that the same technology can make up much smaller energy storage devices to power our mobile phones and laptops, etc. . This is where things get fun because these sorts of devices do operate on domestic voltages. Think about it we could get two to three times as much life span out of a charge on our mobile phone or laptop, but have a full recharge in 5 seconds!
Plausibility
From what I have read, there are some good reasons to think that this is not some sort of grandiose wishful thinking. Firstly, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers have put venture capitol into this. This is the same company who first funded Amazon and Google. EEStor has signed a contract with Loáckheed-Martin for military and homeland security uses. Also, the material they are using as their dielectric (based on Barium Titanate) is in the same group of materials that other researchers are researching into for the same goal.
- This blog post has been based on information I have gathered from episode 117 of Security Now and the Wikipedia article for EEStor.
Related links:
Dec 3
Editorial David
cloning, donation, energy, fission, fusion, genetics, nuclear, organ, population, science
In the news lately, I’ve been hearing lots about alternative energies and the UK debate on whether to introduce “presumed consent” into human organ donation. What infuriates me every time when I hear these stories is that there are some clear cut, mostly technological, strategies that would answer all these problems, yet nobody talks about them. Ergo, our white elephants that could save the world as we know it.
- Nuclear Fusion is carbon free energy.Everyone is looking for “carbon free” energy. So, they go to renewable energies (which I support), and they look to contemporary nuclear energy. Now, before you get on my case about nuclear, let me teach you something. Our present day nuclear energy comes from a process called “nuclear fission” where you have large unstable atoms that release energy as they break apart into smaller, but still unstable and heavy atoms. “Unstable” is the key word here, it’s the lack of stability in an atom that makes it radioactive, and dangerous.
Meanwhile, “nuclear fusion” is the complete opposite, it is the clashing together of light, stable atoms, e.g. hydrogen, to form heavier yet even more stable atoms, e.g. Helium. Not only are the by-products of this more safe and stable, but the energy released, per atom, from fusing lighter atoms, is far greater than that released by having heavy atoms fall apart into lighter ones.
The only problem here, is that no one has quite perfected nuclear fusion yet. It takes a lot of energy to smash two atoms together and make them stick. So far, fusion experiments are consuming more energy than they are producing. Although, research has been going on for a long time and we’re getting closer.
If only governments across the world would cooperate* and make a concerted effort to perfect fusion. Then, the world’s energy needs would be satisfied, and we wouldn’t be causing any pollution.
* An international project was once undertaken, but most countries dropped out due to political reasons.
- Pollution comes from energy production, but energy requirements come from people.This is going to be a bit of a controversial point, but stick with me and follow my logic. The majority of the CO2 emissions in the world come from energy production. At it’s root, what drives demand for energy production? Population size, that’s what! (You’d be right to say industry too, but if there’s less people, there’s less industry). So, to be responsible in managing our home, i.e. planet Earth, the human race needs to curb it’s population growth. Particularly developing nations like India and China have a ridiculous number of people. Sure, I can see there would be arguments for having a stupendously high birth rate when mortality rates were nearly as high in those countries, but times are changing. Medical care is, overall, improving, so there is less mortality. This is why you see the population boom that there clearly is; there are more people being born than are dying.
Therefore, to try and save our home, the human race needs to drastically reduce it’s birth rate. This may sound harsh or naive, but consider the following. If we keep going as we are, the planet will slash our population size for us, and it won’t be as kind as simply using contraception or sterilisation. No, the seas will rise, available land area will fall, and with it we will have less land to grow crops and cattle. There will be as many of us, if not more, than there is now, packed into smaller areas of land with less to eat. Hopefully I don’t need to paint the picture of what would happen next.
- Don’t donate organs, grow organs!Organ donation is a controversial subject. Some people are more than happy to have their parts used after their death, while others don’t want to feel as if they are receiving second class medical care because they could be viewed as a walking bag of spare parts.
In the meantime, there are thousands of people on waiting lists for a compatible organ to be harvested from a willing donor who has happened to die just at the right time. I understand and sympathise with both sides of the argument.
However, it is all unnecessary! Stem cell research is close to being able to clone organs. If sufficient investment was made, then all the problems of availability, consent and organ rejection go away; because everyone would have 100% genetically compatible organs grown for them from their own genetic material. I believe in this solution so much, I would even go so far as to say that relatives of people in need of organs are wasting their time campaigning for people to carry donor cards. Instead, they should spend their campaigning efforts on campaigning for awareness and funding for cloned organs.
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Google
Flickr
YouTube
RSS
