The difference between social news and social bookmarking. A guide.
Dec 22
Editorial 2 Comments
bookmarking, digg, news, reddit, social, social bookmarking, social news, stumbleupon, yahoo buzz
Approximate reading time is 2 minutes
If you’re one of those people who wonder what all those colourful little icons at the bottom of posts on blogs and news sites are for, then this blog post will hopefully be for you.
For a long time I struggled to make sense of the world of (what I vaguely termed) “social bookmarking”. There are big name sites you may have heard of, but there are even more. Although, in the view I’ve built you can seperate them into two broad sets.
I’ll start with what I call “social news”. These are sites which are best used for time relevant posts, such as posts from news sites. The sites I term as “social news” don’t tend to be so good for reference material. The strength of social news sites is to “vote up” posts, stories, etc, that are popular today or this week. They’re a constant popularity contest, and nothing stays at the top for long. As such, you don’t get anything posted that, while interesting or useful, isn’t of the moment. So to speak.
What I call “social bookmarking” sites get a much wider spectrum of sites being submitted. Rather than “voting up”, the idea of social bookmarking is for people to add whatever they find interesting.
It has been my experience that if you are looking for something specific, perhaps a tech review, the social bookmarking sites are fare more likely to find you something useful. It is unlikely that someone would go to a social news site with, say, a mobile phone review, it isn’t news, as such.
Examples of social news sites are Digg, Yahoo Buzz and Reddit. All of these sites work in the same basic way. Someone submits a site, and if other people find it interesting they vote up the story. The more votes a story has got, the more likely it is to be shown on the site’s front page.
Examples of social bookmarking sites are Stumble Upon and Delicious. Delicious is a simple concept, you submit a bookmark along with a description and “tags” (i.e. keywords). Delicious has been running for so long that there is a wealth of submitted links and searching often yields good results. Stumble Upon does the same but takes things a step further. Stumble Upon operates via a browser toolbar. On sites you visit, you can click on buttons on the toolbar to say whether you like the site or not. After Stumble Upon learn’s your preferences you can ask it to take you to recommended sites. So, not only can you search Stumble Upon, but you can let it show you things you may find interesting.
If you found this interesting and want to know more, here are some other blog posts:
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Google
Flickr
YouTube
RSS
Thinking about bookmarking
People can’t tell the difference between Windows 7 and KDE
May 02, 2009 @ 10:51:18
Apart form Yahoo Buzz, I use all the sites you mention quite regularly. I haven’t found a bookmarking service yet though that I feel’s good enough to replace the bookmarks in my own Internet browser!
Stumbleupon is more for stumbling across sites and coming across new discoveries, rather than actually being good at organising and accessing my bookmarks.
Delicious is one step closer to being a good replacement but having to use tags, instead of folders or categories, just isn’t as intuitive when it comes to wanting to find a bookmark quickly, or in an organised manner.
May 02, 2009 @ 11:21:23
I know what you mean about Delicious tags and quick access. I’ve since taken to having a split system. I keep a very few bookmarks kept in my browser, specifically for quick access. But then everything else I bookmark that goes under the heading “oh, that might be interesting or useful one day” goes into my Delicious account which I will refer to and search within when I want to look for something I know I may have bookmarked sometime in the past.